Comparison
YourMail vs Resend
Resend is a genuinely good product and the obvious reference point for anything in this category, including this one. The real difference is narrower than a comparison page usually admits: where the mail is sent from, what is written down about the data, and how much product you want beyond sending.
Side by side
No prices for Resend on this page. They change, and a stale price on a page that benefits us is the most common way a comparison misleads — check their pricing directly. Ours is on our pricing page.
| YourMail | Resend | |
|---|---|---|
| Where mail is sent from | London (eu-west-2), on AWS SES — the region the code configures and the region the message headers show. | Multi-region sending, including an EU region. They publish the current list themselves; if where the send originates matters to your review, check it against their documentation rather than our summary of it. |
| Compliance surface | Article 28 processor terms published in full and in draft pending legal review — readable now, not yet executable. Alongside them, and already running: a named sub-processor list with 30 days' notice before it changes, self-serve export and deletion, and a per-account retention window of 30, 90 or 365 days after which bodies and attachments are stripped while the delivery record survives. | A DPA and the usual vendor compliance surface. Established company, longer track record, more procurement teams have already been through it than have been through ours. |
| What is claimed about data residency | Sending is in the UK — London (eu-west-2), on AWS SES: it is the region the code configures and it is visible in the headers of mail you receive, so it is checkable rather than asserted. Storage residency at rest is not claimed, because we do not have it in writing from our database provider. Stated on the page rather than left for a reviewer to discover. | Read their own documentation for the current position rather than taking our summary of it. |
| React email templates | Supported — pass a React element instead of HTML, via the optional @react-email/render peer dependency. | They maintain react-email itself. It is their library, the integration is first-party, and it is excellent. |
| Maturity | New. Live with real customers and real mail, and honest that it is early. | Years of production use, a large user base, and an ecosystem of integrations and starters that assume it. |
| Managed unsubscribe | RFC 8058 one-click List-Unsubscribe injected and enforced on sends marked bulk, with the suppression scoped so an unsubscribe blocks bulk mail and never blocks a password reset. | Broadcast and audience features with unsubscribe handling; a different shape aimed at a wider product. |
| Product scope | Transactional sending only. No campaigns, no audiences, no marketing product. | Transactional plus broadcasts and audience management — more product, if you want more product. |
Where Resend is the better choice
Written by us, about a competitor, on our own site — so treat it as a starting point and not an audit. It is here because a comparison with nothing in this section is not a comparison.
React Email
They wrote it. If your templates are react-email components, you are using their library either way, and the first-party path will always be better supported than a compatible one. We support it; we do not maintain it.
Maturity, and everything that follows from it
More production years, more people who have hit the edge cases before you, more Stack Overflow answers, more starters and boilerplates with it already wired in. For a team that wants the boring choice, that is a real and rational reason to pick them over us.
Breadth
If you want broadcasts, audiences and marketing sends alongside transactional mail, they have a product for that and we deliberately do not. Running two vendors to avoid one is rarely the right call.
When the UK angle actually matters
Most of the time it does not, and pretending otherwise would waste your afternoon. It matters when a customer's procurement or security review asks where mail is sent from and expects a specific answer, or when you are selling into UK public sector, healthcare or financial services and a reviewer wants to see it written down rather than inferred.
If that is your situation, the UK sending page sets out what is claimed and — more usefully for a reviewer — what is not. If it is not your situation, weigh the rest of this page on its merits and expect them to be close.
Resend is a trademark of its respective owner. YourMail is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by Resend; the name is used here only to identify the product being compared. Everything above was written by us and reflects our understanding at the time of writing — check anything that matters against their own documentation.
Try it on the free tier
No card. Send from our shared test address before you have verified a domain, so you can see the whole path — queued, sent, delivered — before changing any DNS.